|
| | | | |
| | | |
| Stat |
Members: 3665
Articles: 2'599'751
Articles rated: 2609
03 January 2025 |
|
| | | | |
|
Article overview
| |
|
|
The Black Hole Mass - Spheroid Luminosity relation | | Alister W. Graham
; | | Date: |
6 May 2007 | | Subject: | Astrophysics (astro-ph) | | Abstract: | The differing M_bh-Luminosity relations presented in McLure & Dunlop, Marconi
& Hunt and Erwin et al. have been investigated. A number of issues have been
identified and addressed in each of these studies, including but not limited
to: the removal of a dependency on the Hubble constant; a correction for dust
attenuation in the bulges of disc galaxies; the identification of lenticular
galaxies previously treated as elliptical galaxies; and application of the same
(Y|X) regression analysis. These adjustments result in relations which now
predict similar black hole masses. The optimal K-band relation is
log(M_bh/M_sun) = -0.37(+/-0.04)[M_K +24] + 8.29(+/-0.08), with a total (not
intrinsic) scatter in log M_bh equal to 0.33 dex. This level of scatter is
similar to the value of 0.34 dex from the M_bh-sigma relation of Tremaine et
al. and compares favourably with the value of 0.31 dex from the M_bh-n relation
of Graham & Driver. Using different photometric data, consistent relations in
the B- and R-band are also provided, although we do note that the small (N=13)
R-band sample used by Erwin et al. is found here to have a slope of
-0.30(+/-0.06) and a total scatter of 0.31 dex. Performing a symmetrical
regression on the larger K-band sample gives a slope of -0.40, implying M_bh ~
L^{1.00}. Implications for galaxy-black hole coevolution, in terms of dry
mergers, are briefly discussed, as are predictions for intermediate mass black
holes. Finally, as previously noted by Tundo et al., a potential bias in the
galaxy sample used to define the M_bh-L relations is shown and a corrective
formula provided. | | Source: | arXiv, arxiv.0705.0618 | | Services: | Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites | |
|
|
No review found.
Did you like this article?
Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.
|
| |
|
|
|
REGISTER