Science-advisor
REGISTER info/FAQ
Login
username
password
     
forgot password?
register here
 
Research articles
  search articles
  reviews guidelines
  reviews
  articles index
My Pages
my alerts
  my messages
  my reviews
  my favorites
 
 
Stat
Members: 3645
Articles: 2'506'133
Articles rated: 2609

27 April 2024
 
  » arxiv » 1509.0101

 Article overview



Quantum Spin Fluctuations and magnons in antiferromagnetically coupled bilayers with tuneable intra-bilayer exchange - the case of Cr$_2$W(Te)O$_6$
Kingshuk Majumdar ; S. D. Mahanti ;
Date 1 Sep 2015
AbstractRecent neutron diffraction studies have shown that in Cr$_2$(W,Te)O$_6$ systems, which consist of bilayers with strong antiferromagnetic inter-bilayer coupling between Cr moments, the intra-bilayer coupling between the Cr moments can be tuned from ferro (for W) to antiferro (for Te). {it Ab initio} density functional calculations provide a microscopic understanding of the magnetic structure but cannot explain the magnitude of the ordered Cr$^{3+}$ moments. In order to understand the reduction of the ordered moment caused by quantum spin fluctuations (QSF) we have studied the magnon dispersion and the sublattice magnetization using a two parameter quantum Heisenberg spin Hamiltonian with tunable intra-($j$) and antiferromagnetic inter- ($J$) bilayer couplings. In the $j=0$ limit the system reduces to decoupled quantum dimers. The magnon dispersion and normalized sublattice magnetization (NSM) have been calculated using non-linear spin wave theory up to second-order corrections ($1/S^2$) in spin $S$. The effect of $J$ is quite dramatic when $j$ is ferromagnetic, a large peak in magnon dispersion appears at the corner of the Brillouin zone for large $J$ (realistic case) in addition to changing the quadratic dispersion to linear. Inelastic neutron scattering experiments can confirm this theoretical prediction. The effect of $J$ on NSM is simple when $j$ is ferromagnetic, NSM decreases monotonically with $J$. In contrast when $j$ is antiferromagnetic the effect of $J$ is to suppress QSF effect until $Jsim j$ but further increase in $J$ gives rise to increasing QSF reduction of the NSM. These theoretical results are qualitatively consistent with experiment.
Source arXiv, 1509.0101
Services Forum | Review | PDF | Favorites   
 
Visitor rating: did you like this article? no 1   2   3   4   5   yes

No review found.
 Did you like this article?

This article or document is ...
important:
of broad interest:
readable:
new:
correct:
Global appreciation:

  Note: answers to reviews or questions about the article must be posted in the forum section.
Authors are not allowed to review their own article. They can use the forum section.






ScienXe.org
» my Online CV
» Free


News, job offers and information for researchers and scientists:
home  |  contact  |  terms of use  |  sitemap
Copyright © 2005-2024 - Scimetrica